درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Despite communication challenges, research suggests that children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can benefit from foreign language education. This aligns with their strengths in visual learning and the documented effect of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) in teaching language to children with ASD. Building on these strengths, this qualitative case study investigated the effectiveness of combining Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) strategies for teaching English language skills to an 8-year-old boy with high-functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) at Sara Autism Center. The study employed detailed observations to explore the participant's experience learning English as a foreign language. The findings revealed a significant increase in vocabulary (30 words within three months) and highlighted the effect of ABA and PECS in facilitating language acquisition and generalization. The use of the Let Me Talk app on an iPad to support communication and parental involvement were identified as crucial factors for success. This case study emphasizes the importance of multimodal learning approaches. It also highlights the need to tailor interventions to individual needs for effective language development in autistic children. The findings offer valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and parents invested in improving educational outcomes for children with ASD.

Language system is best considered as a stage on which ideology is represented while translation as a channel of interlingual communication and a socially contextualized enterprise is exposed to different ideological considerations. This exposure seems unavoidable whether the translation serves as a purposeful mental enterprise or the final product of a systematic process beginning with a source text (ST) and ending with a target text (TT). Anyway, the translator’s linguistic options are affected by some ideological orientations, manifested in varying degrees. This study aims at identifying and illustrating the degree of ideological skewness of the Persian translation of The Catcher in the Rye through the proposed model, including some distinctive ideology-bound features. A two-level assessment procedure at intra-textual and extra-textual levels was applied to the texts to identify their ideological trends. The findings individually analyzed considering the analytic model suggested the applicability of the proposed model to uncover the ideological underpinnings at play in the texts, which involved a possibly considerable degree of ideological skewness. Regarding the multi-dimensional essence of translation as a product and process, this study set out to reflect a perhaps more dynamic perspective of the ideological matters, yet it needs to be refined through further research.

This study aimed to unravel the EFL students’ technology acceptance toward the implementation of Technology-Mediated Syntax Learning (TMSL) and unveil its impact on EFL students' learning autonomy and English Syntax (ES) learning achievement. Therefore, the quantitative study was operated through descriptive analysis and pre-experimental design. The descriptive analysis was done to scrutinize the EFL students' technology acceptance and learning autonomy toward implementing TMSL. The pre-experimental study was conducted to know the effect of TMSL implementation on ES learning achievement. The participants of this study were 121 students who joined the English Syntax course in the English Education Department, Faculty of Education and Teachers Training at a public university in West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. The results showed that the participants highly accepted TMSL and depicted high learning autonomy scores. The statistical calculation proved significant differences between participants' ES Pre-test and Post-test scores, meaning that TMSL implementation significantly affected ES learning achievement. However, the distinct results of technology acceptance and autonomy analysis from previous studies suggest further investigation, including applying different research approaches. Hence, this study suggests that a technology integration model gains positive output and outcome for the EFL learning context.

Patrick Modiano en Iran: d'une entrée silencieuse à un accueil enthousiaste. Cet article examine la réception de l'œuvre de Patrick Modiano en Iran en s’appuyant sur la théorie de la réception développée par Hans Robert Jauss. Cette approche met l’accent sur le rôle actif des lecteurs et sur l’évolution de leur « horizon d’attente », influencé par des contextes culturels, historiques et sociaux. Cette étude vise à analyser les raisons du succès tardif de Modiano en Iran et à comprendre comment son œuvre a progressivement conquis un public varié. D’abord méconnu, Modiano a vu sa notoriété croître grâce au Prix Nobel de littérature en 2014. Les traducteurs et éditeurs iraniens ont joué un rôle clé dans l’introduction de ses œuvres auprès des lecteurs. Les thématiques centrales de l’écrivain, sone style épuré et poétique, ainsi que la structure narrative hybride de ses romans ont captivé un lectorat de plus en plus large en Iran.

The flipped classroom model has gained traction in language education; however, its application within English for Specific Purposes (ESP) remains underexplored. The present study investigates the impact of flipped classroom instruction on ESP students’ reading comprehension with a focus on their attitudes toward the model. Adopting a quasi-experimental methodology, the study utilized pretest and posttest assessments alongside a 15-item Likert-scale questionnaire to gather data. The research sample comprised 21 second-semester ESP students from Guilan University majoring in Cellular and Molecular Biology, who engaged in a 10-week intervention. Pre-class preparation included instructional videos and reading materials, while classroom activities centered on group discussions and practical problem-solving tasks. Findings demonstrated a substantial enhancement in posttest scores, validating the approach as effective for improving reading comprehension. The survey results revealed highly positive student attitudes, particularly in terms of engagement, autonomy, and collaborative learning. These findings highlight the potential of the flipped classroom model to address the unique academic requirements of ESP students by blending discipline-specific resources with interactive learning strategies.

Two of the models in the Serial Optimality Theory in which derivational paths compete and are evaluated by Prec(a, b) family of constraints are Optimality Theory- Candidate Chains (OT-CC) and Optimal Interleaving (OI). The former operates exclusively at the level of phonology, while the latter postulates the interplay between morphology and phonology. This article presents a case study of vowel harmony in Kalhori Kurdish that necessitates a level where phonological and morphological processes alternate to account for both the application and lack of application of a phonological process. In Kalhori Kurdish, the features of [o] are spread regressively all the way to the leftmost edge of the verb; however, this is not the case when the coordinating conjunction clitic [=o] is added to the verb. The analysis of the data collected from 15 Kalhori Kurdish speakers revealed that OT-CC cannot simultaneously explain the root-prefix vowel harmony and the absence of this process between the clitic and the verbal ending, unless the morphological information is duplicated at this level. However, benefiting from the possibility of morphological processes alternating with the phonological ones, the OI model successfully explains both the presence and the absence of the vowel harmony

In the second language (L2) assessment realm, cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) emerges as an exceptionally practicable methodology, enabling a meticulous analysis of linguistic competencies and furnishing granular insights into learners’ proficiencies and deficiencies, thereby charting precise remedial pathways. The primary objective of this research was to develop a cognitive model of attributes underlying an International English Language Testing System (IELTS) assessment descriptor, namely grammatical range and accuracy. The model sought to enable the development of a diagnostic instrument informed by CDA, which would investigate candidates’ grammatical strengths and weaknesses to improve their performance in the IELTS. Through a multi-stage process involving qualitative data collection, interpretation, and synthesis, a comprehensive scheme emerged, categorizing cognitive attributes into two main areas: (a) knowledge of grammatical forms, including pronouns, determiners/quantifiers, adjectives, adverbials, nouns/noun phrases, verbs/tenses, and prepositions, and (b) familiarity with structural nuances, including punctuation and structural sophistication. These nine micro-level attributes comprised several sub-components aligned with three proficiency classes: A1-A2, B1-B2, and C1-C2. The model laid the groundwork for developing a three-booklet multiple-choice test. Alongside conducting pilot testing and item analysis, the study employed a saturated psychometric model to validate the CDA-informed instrument. The results confirmed the instruments’ internal consistency, validity, satisfactory fit, and effectiveness in classifying examinees based on attribute-specific mastery levels. The findings underscored severe weaknesses in punctuation, structural complexity, and verb tense usage, pinpointing crucial areas demanding targeted instructional enhancement. The theoretical implications highlight a refined understanding of grammatical competencies, while pedagogically, the results advocate for targeted teaching strategies.

This study investigates the effects of summative, formative, and combined assessments on the development of listening and reading comprehension skills on advanced Iranian EFL learners. Data were collected from 40 advanced EFL learners, aged 19 to 35, from intact classes at a higher education institute, divided into three experimental groups, each receiving one of the assessment types (summative, formative, or a combination of both), along with a control group. Learners’ progress in listening and reading comprehension was measured over a four-month period using pre- and post-tests administered at the end of the term. Data analysis involved ANOVA, ANCOVA, and post hoc LSD tests. The findings of this longitudinal study revealed that while the combined application of formative and summative assessments had a significant positive impact on listening comprehension, neither assessment type alone contributed to improvement in this area. In contrast, the results showed that all forms of assessment—whether summative, formative, or combined—led to notable improvements in reading comprehension. These results highlight the differential effects of assessment types on listening and reading skills, suggesting implications for assessment practices in EFL contexts.

This study investigates the effects of task complexity and task repetition on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. The primary aim was to determine whether varying levels of task complexity and the repetition of these tasks could lead to significant enhancements in learners' reading comprehension abilities. A pretest-posttest design was utilized to assess the participants' performance before and after the intervention. Statistical analyses, including the One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and paired samples t-tests, were conducted to assess data normality and evaluate the significance of observed differences. The findings indicated that both task complexity and task repetition had a substantial positive impact on the reading comprehension scores of Iranian EFL learners. Task complexity promoted deeper cognitive engagement, while task repetition facilitated retention and mastery of reading skills. These results suggest that incorporating strategically designed complex tasks and repeating them can enhance reading comprehension in EFL contexts. The study concludes that task complexity and repetition are effective strategies for improving reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. The enhancement in comprehension can be attributed to the cognitive challenges posed by complex tasks and the reinforcement provided through task repetition. Educators are encouraged to integrate tasks with varying levels of complexity and to implement repetitive practice within their instructional strategies. This approach not only aids in comprehension but also fosters a more engaging learning environment. Future research should explore the optimal levels of task complexity and repetition to maximize learning outcomes and examine their applicability in diverse educational contexts.

The present paper reports a study conducted among Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners, addressing the critical issue of imagined identity/community within a globalized world. The concepts of “imagined identities” and “imagined communities” (ICs) refer to the internalized self-conceptions learners develop regarding who they aspire to be and the broader social groups they envision themselves as part of in the context of language learning, respectively . Drawing on Norton’s (2000, 2001) framework of ICs, this study focused on the diverse imaginations that Iranian EFL learners possess while learning English. The study involved five participants, aged between 13 and 36, and employed a qualitative approach utilizing semi-structured interviews for data collection. Through these interviews, rich narratives illustrating the learners’ unique perspectives emerged. The findings revealed that while the imagined identities/communities differed among participants, a common thread was their significant influence on guiding learners through the language learning process. Moreover, the research indicated that a lack of awareness regarding learners’ desired membership in their ICs could detrimentally impact their engagement and commitment to language learning, often resulting in various forms of non-participation in the classroom. Pedagogical implications of the study for EFL teaching practices, emphasizing the importance of creating classroom environments that validate and support learners' ICs and foster their imagined identities/communities as essential components of effective language instruction, are discussed. The study also offers recommendations for future research endeavors to further explore the dynamic interplay between imagined identities/communities and language learning outcomes.

Chez Elif Shafak, auteure, nouvelliste, essayiste, oratrice, spécialiste et activiste en sciences politiques, les dimensions de l’autobiographie ne se limitent pas aux confins d’une vie. En tant qu’une représentante des femmes écrivains, Shafak entreprend une quête plutôt plurielle pour découvrir son ‘moi’ physique, familial, social et historique qui serait celui de toutes les auteures ou bien toutes les femmes qui sont toujours entravées par les contraintes des sociétés patriarcales. Mais comment une auteure pourrait introduire la fiction dans l’autobiographie ? Shafak est arrivée à le réaliser ? Est-ce que le recours à la fiction et le passage de l’autobiographie à l’autofiction pourrait l’aider à mieux se découvrir et redéfinir les autres femmes, leurs limites et leur statut, sans avoir peur d’être jugée ? C’est la problématique que le présent article va développer, en s’appuyant sur quatre romans de Shafak, La Bâtarde d'Istanbul (2007), Lait noir (2009), Crime d’honneur (2013) et Trois filles d’Eve (2018).

Few studies have addressed the interaction among reader and text variables in reading comprehension. This research probed the role of aspects of lexical knowledge to the TOEFL reading comprehension of passages with low and high lexical cohesion. The extent of this contribution was checked for five types of TOEFL reading test items: Main Idea, Stated Detail, Inference, Reference, and Lexical Inferencing. For this purpose, 60 Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) took the New Vocabulary Levels Test (NVLT), Word Associates Test (WAT), and TOEFL reading comprehension tests with low and high lexical cohesion determined through the computational tool Coh-Metrix. Results of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed that the students outperformed on three types of TOEFL reading items (Main Idea, Inference, and Lexical Inferencing) for texts with high lexical cohesion. Multiple linear regression analyses further showed that vocabulary depth was a stronger predictor of the participants’ scores on Lexical Inferencing item of TOEFL reading texts with high lexical cohesion, while vocabulary size predicted the same item performance for the low-lexical-cohesion subtest. Moreover, vocabulary depth could significantly predict performance on Main Idea test item of TOEFL high-lexical-cohesion subtest over and above the low-lexical-cohesion subtest. The implications for teachers, test designers, and materials writers are discussed.