درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The story of Adam has been a site of debate among religious scholars for various reasons. In this context, examining how commentators engage with the text and articulating their logic of understanding play a significant role in acknowledging the evolution of thought in interpretation. A cognitive triptych by Ayatollah Javadi Amoli regarding the understanding of "The world, human beings, and knowledge" in relation to verses 30-34 can guide us towards this important discourse. The tripartite focus of understanding logic in this story centers on anthropology and defining the characteristics of the perfect human in his relationship with God as the Creator of the Caliphate, and with angels acting as the disciples of the Caliph. From this perspective, the faculty of knowledge of names, which is the source of Caliphate, is endowed in all humans, and the will is the factor that fosters human dignity or conceals it, leading to a fall into bestiality and wickedness. This scene, from a cosmological viewpoint, is transcendent in time and free from the possibility of error, contrasting with the material world as the place of the human elemental body and the origin of its evolutionary movement. In the epistemological dimension, the commentator believes in the existence of levels of knowledge based on the nature of the objects of knowledge across longitudinal realms. Accordingly, the realm of proclamation exists in the intellectual realm and the rights of humans within the status of the self-sufficient being and the realm of the soul. From his perspective, the story of Adam is a case of an external personal matter and informs of a divine and continuous tradition in creating a Caliph on Earth. His departure from the theory of corporeal creation and spiritual permanence in explaining the realms of the soul is also noteworthy in this narrative. The commentator’s statements show the influence of the content of Shia narratives, alongside a prominent application of mystical and philosophical teachings and assumptions

This study examined the translation of Quranic metaphors based on Mandelblit’s (1995) Cognitive Translation Hypothesis (CTH), including a metaphors translation model, summarized as three plans: (a) similar mapping conditions (SMC) with the same or similar wording in translation, (b) SMC but with different wording in translation, (c) and different mapping conditions (DMC). Forty-three Quranic metaphors and their translations by Saffarzadeh (2001) and Arberry (1955) were selected randomly and explored to see in what plan their CTH Quranic metaphors could be placed and how they translated them. Twenty-one metaphors turned out to be SMC and 22 were DMC. Twelve metaphors could be SMC and were rendered in similar wording, four could be SMC and rendered literally by both translators, three metaphors could be SMC and translated in similar wording by Saffarzadeh, three could be SMC and were translated literally by Arberry, and no SMC metaphor to be translated in different wording by either. Also, out of 22 DMC Quranic metaphors, 21 were rendered literally by both translators and one in different wording by both. It was concluded that SMC and DMC conceptual metaphors in Arabic-English conceptualization exist in the Quran, and similar conceptualizations facilitate metaphor translation, while differences can do the opposite.