درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The present study is an attempt to find out whether there is a significant relationship between EFL teachers’ Big Five personality traits and their self-concept. In addition, ittried to examine if there is any significant relationship between teachers' teaching experienceand their self-concept. 112 EFL teachers participated in this study. They were asked to complete NEO Five Factor Inventory and Teacher Self-concept Evaluation Scale. Data were analyzed using Correlation, Multiple Regressions, and ANOVA. Results indicated thatself-concept was significantly correlated with four components of the Big-Five personality traits.It was positively related with ""Neuroticism"", ""Openness to experience"" and ""Conscientiousness"", but negatively related with ""Agreeableness"". It was also revealed that there was not any statistically significant difference among the three groups (low, mid, and high experience EFL teachers) with respect to their self-concept. The overall results of the study were discussed, and the implications for policy and practice were made.

Despite the general findings that address the positive contribution of teaching pragmatic features to interlanguage pragmatic development, the question as to the most effective method is far from being resolved. Moreover, the potential of literature as a means of introducing learners into the social practices and norms of the target culture, which underlie the pragmatic competence, has not been fully explored. This study, then, set out to investigate the possible contribution of plays, as a medium of instruction, to the pragmatic development through either explicit or implicit mode of instruction. To this end, 80 English-major university students were assigned to four experimental groups: two literary and two nonliterary groups. One of the literary groups (Implicit Play) received typographically enhanced plays containing the speech acts of apology, request, and refusal and the other (Explicit Play) received the same treatment in addition to the metapragmatic instruction on the acts. The medium of instruction for the nonliterary groups were dialogs containing the given functions; they were also given either enhanced input (Implicit Dialog) or input plus metapragmatic information (Explicit Dialog). Analyses of the four groups’ performance on a Written Discourse Completion Test (WDCT) before and after the treatment did not show any advantage for the literary medium, i.e., there was no significant difference between literary and nonliterary groups. It was rather the mode of instruction that mattered most, where explicit groups outperformed their implicit counterparts. These findings indicate that even though implicit teaching, that is, exposure to enhanced input followed by some awareness-raising tasks, is effective in pragmatic development, it cannot contribute so much to learning as can the explicit instruction

فراگیری لغات همواره یکی از دشوارترین قسمت های زبان آموزی برای همه ی فراگیران زبان انگلیسی خصوصا دانشجویان زبان تخصصی بوده است. این دانشجویان همواره گله مند هستند که تعداد لغات زبان انگلیسی بسیار زیاد بوده و به راحتی فراموش می شوند. جهت تسهیل یادگیری و یادآوری لغات و کمک به اینگونه دانشجویان، یادیارها که یک گروه از استراتژیهای ذهنی می- باشند معرفی گردیده اند. اما دانشجویان و دانش آموزان دارای تفاوت فردی می باشند و مدرسین می بایست از روش های متعددی استفاده نمایند تا کارایی کلاس افزایش یابد. به همین منظور در پژوهش حاضر روش چند یادیاری مورد استفاده و تحقیق قرار گرفت. دو گروه از دانشجویان در زبان تخصصی انتخاب گردیدند. در یکی از گروهها روش چند یادیاری استفاده شد، در حالیکه در گروه دیگر لغات آموزش داده شده و مرور شدند. نتایج نشان داد که گروهی که برای آنها شیوه چند یادیاری مورد استفاده قرار گرفت در یادگیری و یادآوری لغات موفق تر عمل کردند.

Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see how Kurdish-speaking learners of English employ appraisal resources in their writings. It further aimed to explore whether the appraisal framework can be utilized as an assessment scale for evaluating the students’ argumentative writing. To this end, the study investigated the argumentative essays written by 15 bilingual Kurdish-Iranian graduates of English within the framework of the appraisal theory. The instruments applied in this study consisted of a modified rating scale for assessing the essays in terms of the macrostructures exploited in them and the framework for the analysis of appraisal resources. Quantitative findings revealed high-graded essays employ more attitudinal items and fewer monoglossic resources than low-graded ones. Qualitatively, the high-graded essays articulated attitudinal values in nominal forms and sometimes in a backgrounded manner while these values were mostly presented by surge of feelings and in a foregrounded way in the low-graded essays. Regarding engagement, unlike the high-graded essays, the low-graded ones were poor in recognizing other voices and alternative positions. Inspired by the strength of the appraisal model evaluating writing, results suggest that high-graded essays are successful in positioning readers attitudinally and clarifying the ethical message to readers.

Although uninterpretable features are claimed to be an area of difficulty for EFL learners, they are still one of the less explored areas of research in the field of L2 pedagogy. The present study sought to investigate the impacts of two techniques, namely contrastive analysis and dictogloss on EFL learners’ mastery of resumptive pronouns, an uninterpretable feature absent in English relative clauses but present in most Persian ones. To this end, 77 elementary EFL learners with similar background in English were selected and assigned to three groups: one control and two experimental. Before and after the instruction the participants were administered a 50-item Grammaticality Judgment test and a 20-item translation test which had been developed and validated for use in this study. The results showed that all three groups had significant progression after the treatments, but the comparison among the groups indicated no statistically significant difference. This may suggest that L2 exposure had a more important role in the participants’ performance than the instruction type (contrastive analysis and dictogloss). The findings seem to support the importance of exposure to such L2 structures over time and that instruction cannot always accelerate acquisition.

Abstract in every research paper has always been functioning as an attention-grabber which can encourage readers to keep reading the research or to dissuade it. Although abstracts are believed to play an important role in distributing the research findings, few studies have been done to evaluate the rhetorical organization of thesis abstracts, especially in the field of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). Thus, the purpose of the present study was to analyze the rhetorical moves of the MA thesis abstracts written from 1988 to 2015 in the field of TEFL in Allameh Tabataba’i University (ATU), an Iranian university. To this end, 300 MA thesis abstracts were analyzed based on Hyland’s (2000) rhetorical move framework. To track the rhetorical move trends of the thesis abstracts and for the ease of analysis, they were analyzed in three time intervals. The results revealed that while in the first interval (1988-1997) the most frequent rhetorical moves were the “Purpose”, “Method”, and “Product”, in the other two intervals (1998-2007 and 2008-2015) the “Purpose” was the most used rhetorical move. In addition, the least frequent rhetorical moves were the “Introduction” and “Conclusion” for the three intervals. The findings, on top of these, indicated that the rhetorical move patterns of thesis abstracts moved from Purpose-Method-Product (P-M-Pr) to Introduction-Purpose-Method-Product-Conclusion (I-P-M-Pr-C). That said, it can be concluded that in the examined thesis abstracts, the highest average of information was provided on the “Purpose” of the study, while the other moves, especially the conclusion move, was not deemed important; moreover, an increasing rate of information provision was detected on the “Method” and “Product” moves. This research bears some implications for L2 learners to better know their community of practice and writing instructors to prepare genre-based writing materials.

فرهنگ جنبه ای جدانشدنی از حیات هر جامعه و هر تمدن انسانی است و حین ترجمه یک اثر، تنها نمی توان از زبان مبدأ به زبان مقصد رسید بلکه گذر از فرهنگ مبدأ به فرهنگ مقصد نیز الزامی است. مشکل نمایاندن فرهنگ مبدأ هنگامی جد ی تر می شود که دو فرهنگ مبدأ و مقصد با هم متفاوتند یا حتی در تقابل با یکدیگر قرار دارند. بنابراین عملی که در یک فرهنگ کاملاً پذیرفته شده است در فرهنگ دیگر تابو (جزء امور نهی شده) محسوب می شود. با انتخاب دوبلاژ به عنوان یکی ازگونه های ترجمه ی سمعی بصری، قصد داریم تا راهبردهای اتخاذ شده در ترجمه ی مراجع فرهنگی در فیلم ژرمینال را که ساخته ی کلود بری در سال 1993 است، با توجه به نقش سفارش دهنده ی ترجمه و مخاطب اثر بررسی کنیم. شیوه هایی چون ""معادل گزینی"" ""اقتباس"" ""تعمیم"" و حتی ""وامگیری"" در ترجمه مولفه های فرهنگی در این فیلم به کار رفته اند.