حامد بادپا

This study employed a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design to examine the impact of backward design (BD), central design (CD), and forward design (FD) on the speaking proficiency and engagement of 75 intermediate-level Iranian EFL learners, aged 18–21, selected through convenience sampling at Arak University, Iran. Participants attended nine weekly 105-minute sessions over one semester, with intermediate proficiency verified by the Oxford Quick Placement Test. Pre-tests established baseline speaking abilities, and participants were divided into three groups of 25: BD group (BDG), CD group (CDG), and FD group (FDG). Data were gathered using IELTS speaking pre- and post-tests, a student engagement scale (SES), and semi-structured interviews. The BDG focused on defining learning outcomes and using assessments such as observations and recorded speeches to track progress and adjust instruction. The FDG prioritized structured activities targeting specific speaking skills, using formative and summative assessments to evaluate mastery. The CDG adopted a learner-centric approach, incorporating personas, scenarios, and open educational resources to create collaborative, engaging activities emphasizing social context and emotional growth. Post-intervention results revealed CD as the most effective in enhancing speaking proficiency and engagement, followed by BD, with FD being the least effective. These findings underscore CD’s strength in fostering interactive, meaningful learning experiences for Iranian EFL learners. The study suggests that curriculum developers and educators should prioritize learner-centered approaches, such as CD, to improve EFL speaking outcomes and engagement.

The teaching and learning of grammar have continuously been core areas of discussion among practitioners of TEFL. Despite significant investment in creating optimal conditions for grammar learning, it remains essential to explore innovative instructional methods that enable learners to engage meaningfully with grammatical structures, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of grammar acquisition. Learners may reconstruct various grammatical structures by interpreting grammar from their textbooks while drawing upon their own experiences, resources, and events from life. This is called a learning-oriented approach that involves hypothesis testing and conceptualization that, in turn, incubates awareness of one's limitations and needs. This study investigates whether the remodeling method of grammar instruction, where learners reconstruct grammatical structures based on personal experiences, significantly enhances Iranian EFL learners' grammatical and vocabulary proficiency. The research employed an experimental research design where a pretest was administered, and a posttest was administered. The study involved forty high school EFL students aged 15 to 16 from Imam Khomeini Technical High School in Shahreza, situated in the southern part of Isfahan province in Iran. While the performance of learners in the experimental group subjected to remodeling method interventions was obtained, their control group, which was not subjected to such intervention, was measured for comparison. The findings revealed that the experimental group recorded a higher improvement in grammatical knowledge due to the remodeling approach. Furthermore, the results indicated that engaging in the remodeling of various structures allowed learners to communicate more effectively in oral interactions and to enhance their understanding of grammar and vocabulary. Statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups. This study underscores the value of incorporating the strategy of having students remodel various structures based on their concepts in English language instruction to foster greater proficiency in the language. Based on the findings, the researcher recommends utilizing, activating, and implementing this strategy on the other skills of the English language.