تحلیل اثرات حکمروایی خوب بر زیست پذیری روستاها: مورد مطالعه شهرستان درمیان (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
حکمروایی خوب لازمه توسعه پایدار روستایی از طریق مدیریت مبتنی بر مشارکت حداکثری مردم و سازگار با ارزش های اجتماعی و زیست پذیری در ابعاد مختلف زندگی روستایی است. تحقیق حاضر با هدف تحلیل اثرات حکمروایی خوب بر زیست پذیری سکونت گاه های روستایی شهرستان درمیان در استان خراسان جنوبی انجام شده است. این پژوهش ازنظر ماهیت در زمره تحقیقات توصیفی – تحلیلی و از لحاظ هدف در زمره تحقیات کاربردی به حساب می آید. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 23 روستا با 1801 خانوار است که برحسب معیار طبقه های جمعیتی، موقعیت قرارگیری و پراکنش فضایی به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. حجم نمونه مورد مطالعه در سطح خانوار با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 317 خانوار به دست آمد. مؤلفه حکمروایی خوب با 8 شاخص در قالب 31 گویه و مؤلفه زیست پذیری با 11 شاخص در قالب 53 گویه از طریق پرسش نامه محقق ساخته مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. یافته های تحقیق نشان داد که مؤلفه های حکمروایی و زیست پذیری از منظر جامعه محلی در سطح مطلوبی قرار ندارند؛ اما تحلیل همبستگی میان شاخص ها بیانگر همبستگی مثبت و نسبتاً قوی بین آن ها است. نتایج رگرسیون چندمتغیره نیز بیانگر این است که متغیرهای پاسخگویی، مسئولیت پذیری و قانون محوری دارای بیشترین تأثیر و متغیرهای مشارکت، عدالت محوری و شفافیت دارای کمترین تأثیر بر زیست پذیری روستایی هستند.Analysis of the Effects of Good Governance on Rural Livability: Case Study of Darmian County
Introduction
Introduction: Good governance is essential for sustainable rural development, promoting management based on maximum community participation and social values to enhance livability in various aspects of rural life. As governance theory evolves, competent governance has emerged as a key focus due to its effectiveness in fostering collaboration between government and citizens in public affairs management. Effective governance is achieved when all local stakeholders are involved in policy-making, planning, organization, implementation, and monitoring processes. Rural areas in the country face challenges such as population decline, particularly in dry and border regions, impacting the economic and social fabric of rural communities. This study aims to assess the impact of competent governance on rural livability in border regions of South Khorasan province, providing insights into the role of governance in enhancing the livability of rural villages and ensuring their sustainability.
Materials and Methods
This research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach and is classified as applied research. Data collection methods include literature review and surveys. A researcher-designed questionnaire, validated and tested for reliability, was used to collect data on good governance (comprising eight indicators with 31 questions) and livability (comprising ten indicators with 51 questions). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multivariate regression were employed to analyze the data gathered through surveys. The study population consisted of 93 villages with approximately 10,000 households, with a sample of 23 villages (6,525 people and 1,801 households) selected based on population size, location, and distribution criteria. The sample size was determined using Cochran's formula, resulting in 317 households.
Results and Discussion
Analysis of the research sample's responses revealed that the participation index had the highest average score (3.11) among the good governance indicators, while the justice-centered index had the lowest average (2.59). In terms of rural livability, the sense of belonging to a place scored the highest (3.08), while the landscape index had the lowest average (2.3). The overall averages for good governance and livability were below optimal levels, as confirmed by one-sample t-tests. The research findings indicated a positive impact of all governance indicators on livability, with the accountability index having the most significant effect (coefficient of 0.719), explaining the majority of variance in livability. The participation index had the least impact (0.536) on rural livability in the study area.
Conclusions
The study revealed that governance and livability in the study area were perceived as suboptimal by the local community, possibly influenced by challenging environmental conditions near Afghanistan. However, there was a positive and significant correlation between governance indicators and rural livability, with the responsibility index showing the strongest correlation and the participation index the weakest. The regression model demonstrated that all governance indicators positively influenced livability, with the accountability index having the most substantial impact and the participation index the least impact on rural livability in the study area.
تبلیغات
