آرشیو

آرشیو شماره‌ها:
۵۴

چکیده

دانشگاه پژوهی و اندیشیدن پیرامون مسائل دانشگاه ایرانی امروز یکی از مهمترین ضروریات کشور در حوزه ی علم و آموزش و فرهنگ است. این مهم نمی تواند بدون وجه نظر به آرای دانشگاهیان، دانشگاه پژوهان و متفکران ایرانی میسر گردد. این مقاله ضمن نگاهی اجمالی به دانشگاه پژوهی در آرای پژوهندگان، غیبت متفکر ایرانی دکتر علی شریعتی در دانشگاه ایرانی را مورد تامل قرار داده به معدود آثاری که دانشگاهیان ایرانی در خصوص وی نگاشته اند اشاره می کند. یکی از کتاب هایی که سیدجواد طباطبایی فقید در سال های پایانی حیات خویش نگاشت عبارت است از "ملاحظاتی درباره دانشگاه". این مقاله بر آن است تا، ضمن ارج نهادن به نفس ملاحظاتی از این دست که دانشگاه را موضوعی برای اندیشیدن و تأمل قرار می دهند، امکان داوری در خصوص توفیق یا عدم توفیق طباطبایی در تدوین ملاحظات خویش درباره ی دانشگاه، بدون توقف بر پریشانی ها و پراکندگی های شکلی و صوری آن، و با وجه نظر به فاصله ی کاذبی که ایشان از شریعتی اتخاذ کرده است فراهم سازد. مدعای اصلی این مقاله علی رغم اذعان به ضرورت دانشگاه پژوهی در ایران تذکار به حضور شبح گون و پنهان و آشکار شریعتی در ملاحظات طباطبایی درباره ی دانشگاه می باشد. در این مقاله هم چنین تلاش می کند ذیل پروژه دانشگاه پژوهی مخاطب را در خصوص دانشگاه ایرانی و غیبت شریعتی به عنوان یکی از متفکران ایرانی در آن به اندیشه و تامل وادارد.

Considerations about university studies and the absence of Shariati in Iranian universities

Researching and thinking about Iranian university issues today is one of the most important needs of the country in the field of science, education and culture. This matter cannot be achieved without the opinions of Iranian academics, researchers and thinkers. In this article, an attempt is made to reflect on the absence of the Iranian thinker Dr. Ali Shariati in Iranian universities, while giving a glimpse of university research in the opinion of researchers. and also mention the few works written by Iranian academics about him. One of the books that Seyyed Javad Tabatabai wrote in the last years of his life is "Considerations about the University". This article aims to, while honoring such considerations that make the university a subject for thinking and reflection, the possibility of judgment regarding the success or failure of Tabatabai in formulating his considerations about the university, without stopping at formal problems and dispersions. and its form, and in view of the false distance that he has adopted from Shariati. The main claim of this article, despite acknowledging the necessity of university research in Iran, is to mention the shadowy, hidden and overt presence of Shariati in Tabatabai's considerations about the university. In this article, he also tries to make the audience think about the Iranian university and Shariati's absence in it under the university research project. Keyword: university studies; Iranian University; Ali Shariati; Seyyed Javad Tabatabaei; Reformation Introduction Among the few academicians who have addressed the field of "research university" in their works, few have paid attention to the presence/absence of the thoughts of Iranian thinkers, including Shariati, in Iranian universities. Among these works, the book "Notes on the University" by Seyyed Javad Tabatabai, who paid attention to both the university and Shariati's views, is analyzed in this article. In the criticism of the Iranian university, we can offer some points worth thinking about; Before the Iranian university questioned what the university is; It has assumed its existence in advance; And this means avoiding thinking about the foundation and avoiding critical thinking aimed at criticizing the university as a pathology of the university. The Iranian university is obliged to explain the reasons for passing Shariati and of course most Iranian thinker. Methodology Comparative content analysis of the book "Considerations about University" by Seyed Javad Tabatabai and "What should be done?" The work of Ali Shariati in relation to the mission of Iranian universities is considered in this research. Seyyedjavad Tabatabai has discussed the development of Iranian universities in his book Considerations about the University. Tabatabai's main claim in his remarks about the university in Iran is that the university in the West has been formed in the continuity and transformation of the tradition, but in Iran such a transformation has not happened in the formation and establishment of the university Discussion Tabatabai concludes in the book "Considerations about the university" that the university should not be one of the two science systems in the country, but should be the only science system that will be responsible for all the responsibilities of the school. In a university whose subject is Iranshahr, the field is within the university in the sense that it is subordinate to the science system of the national university. The emergence and objective emergence of the logic of the formation of a national university from traditional schools for the first time and about half a century ago and in a reasoned and comprehensive way goes back to Shariati's effort while attending Hosseiniyeh Irshad, as a progressive religious foundation and as an intermediate link between traditional schools and National University, in the collection of works number 20, What should be done?, has discussed it in detail. It should be acknowledged that

تبلیغات