روابط فرهنگی و برهم کنش های تمدن های هیرمند و سند در هزاره سوم ق.م. با تأکید بر سفال و مُهر (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
مطالعات باستان شناسی ای که درطی قرن بیستم در دو حوزه تمدن هیرمند و سند انجام شده، مواد همگون و همسانی را آشکار ساخته که حکایت از روابط فرهنگی میان شرق فلات ایران و شبه قاره هند در عصر مفرغ دارد. جستار حاضر به بررسی برهم کنش های میان این دو حوزه فرهنگی، از دیدگاه باستان شناسی می پردازد و تلاش دارد با نشان دادن این مشابهت ها، برخی از زوایای تاریک مناسبات فرهنگی و اقتصادی میان سیستان و دشت سند در روزگار باستان را واکاوی کند. برای دستیابی به این هدف، موادی همچون سفال و مُهر- که از کاوش محوطه هایی نظیر شهرِسوخته در دشت سیستان و محوطه های هاراپایی در حوزه سند کشف شده- با همدیگر مقایسه شده و در اثنای انجام این کار نیز کوشش شده تا دیدگاه های جدیدی که برخی از آن ها حاصل کنکاش های ذهنی نگارنده در این باب است، به آن ها اضافه شود. نتایج این پژوهش بیانگر آن است که سیستان به دلیل قرارگرفتن در موقعیت جغرافیایی ویژه و در امتداد راه های مبادلاتیِ سنگ های نیمه قیمتی همچون لاجورد، به عنوان یک لولای فرهنگی، نقش فعالی را در پیونددادن سرزمین های هم جوار همچون شبه قاره هند، آسیای مرکزی، بخش های جنوب شرق و غربی فلات ایران، سواحل جنوبی دریای مکران و خلیج فارس و میان رودان ایفا می کرده است.Cultural interactions among the Hilmand Civilization and the Indus Valley during the third millennium BCE
Archaeological surveys and excavations conducted during the last century in two cultural zones (i.e. Helmand Valley and Indus plain) have brought to light a homogenous material cultural indicating the presence of an interaction sphere between the Iranian Plateau and the Indian Subcontinent in the third millennium BCE. The present article tries, from one hand, to investigate cultural interactions in these two regions and from another hand, through comparisons, shed lights on some dark aspects of the cultural and economic ties between ancient Sistan and Indus Valley. In this regard, two main archaeological finds (pottery and seal) coming from Sistani and Indus sites allow us further remarks on this topic. The results indicate that, due to its strategic geographical position alongside the exchange and commercial routes, the Sistan Plain (as a bridge) played a fundamental role in connecting the Indo-Iranian Borderlands, central Asia, the northern/southern coasts of the Persian Gulf, the Makran coasts as well as the Indian Subcontinent. In summary, these close cultural ties, dated back to the Bronze Age, attest old and uninterrupted mutual interconnections between two regions, from old period to the present time. 1. IntroductionLong-distance trade and cultural interactions are counted among those characteristics specifying the complexity of the ancient societies. From the fifth millennium BCE onward, with an increase of the social and economic complexities, several archaeological materials could be recognized as the evidence of exchange networks in the ancient world. In the third millennium BCE, the southeastern part of Iranian Plateau and particularly the Sistan Plain, via active exchange networks, were commercially engaged in economic contacts with neighboring or even far regions including the Indus Valley, Central Asia, southwestern Iran and Mesopotamia. This article aims to investigate cultural interactions between the Helmand Civilization (Shahr-i Sokhta and Mundigak) and the Indus Valley (Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa) by using archaeological evidence such as pottery and seals.2. DiscussionStein is the pioneer of cultural interactions studies in a vast region coined by him as the “Indo-Iranian Borderlands” (Stein 1937). After the beginning of excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta and Tepe Yahya (two main proto-historic sites in Sistan and Kerman), the similarities between material cultures of those two sites motivated the excavators to publish a co-signed article introducing some analogies and integrations between both the sites (Lamberg-Karlovsky and Tosi 1973). In the first decade of the present century, Elisa Cortesi and her colleagues followed this effort by another article focused on the cultural relations between Sistan, Makran and Indus (Cortesi et al. 2008). At the moment, it seems useful to investigate some other aspects of cultural interactions between two regions and to introduce further new data on the subject.In this way, to analyze cultural interactions of sistan and Indus, firstly a comparison of pottery could be considered as a key factor. In this regards, typological studies on the pottery show a great degree of analogy in motifs and forms at Shahr-i Sokhta and Mundigak. At the same time, Nal polychrome ware which characterizes the northern and central Baluchistan is present among the pottery corpus of Shahr-i Sokhta and Mundigak. Few Harappan potsherds found at Sistan are the proofs of a direct contact between Shahr-i sokhta and Harappan sites.So far, a fragment of cylinder seal with Harappan signs found at Sistan is the most important Indus finding (Knox 1994). Although, it’s finding circumstance in an archaeological context is not clear, however, it is an evidence of commercial exchange between two regions.3. ConclusionArchaeological evidence reveals a large degree of cultural integration among the Indo-Iranian-Borderlands. In this vast area, not only Shahr-i Sokhta played an important role in the evolution of urbanization patterns and economic complexity but also in spreading these patterns to the adjacent regions including Indus, southern Turkmenia and the northern part of Helmand basin. Shahr-i Sokhta acted as an important provider of raw materials (such as lapis lazuli and turquoise) for Susa and Mesopotamian markets too. Archaeometric studies indicate one of the sources for providing of agate for the Indus markets was the Helmand basin as small pebbles of this stone could be found on the riverbed. As it is indicated by the analysis of the corpus, direct and indirect mechanisms of relationship could be envisaged for exchanging goods and ideas. From one hand, the Harappan pottery is found at Shahr-i Sokhta specifying a direct contact and from another hand, the so-called "Nal pottery" form a meaningful percentage of pottery corpus at Shahr-i Sokhta since the first period of settlement, allowing suggesting also indirect contacts.Moreover, the existence of stone weights and weighing systems in Sistan and Indus highlights the economic role of Shahr-i Sokhta in interactions with Mesopotamia and Indus. With regard to ancient gaming boards, one can bear in mind that Sistan was a center for invention and distribution of gaming boards in the ancient world judging from the abundance of gaming pieces found in various archaeological contexts at Shahr-i Sokhta. About ancient itineraries between Sistan and Indus, different routes could be identified. At first glance, it seems that connecting routes between Sistan and Indus were passed via Makran. But the passages of Qandahar Plain could be also considered as an ideal substitution. It is noteworthy to emphasize the list of objects confirming cultural interactions between two regions are not limited to the mentioned items and second research could best illustrate these cultural interactions sphere.4. ReferencesAmiet, P. (1986). L’âge des échanges inter-iraniens: 3500-1700 avant J.-C. Notes et documents des Musées de France, Paris: Editions des Réunions des Musées Nationaux. Amiet, P., & Tosi, M. (1978). Phase 10 at Shahr-i Sokhta in square XDV and the late 4th millennium B.C. assemblage of Sistan. East and West, 28, 9-31.Besenval, R. (1997). Entre le sud-est iranien et la plaine de l’Indus: le Kech Makran. Recherches archéologiques sur le peuplement ancien d’une marche des confins Indo-Iranien. Arts Asiatiques, 52, 5-36.Casal, J.M. (1961). Fouilles de Mundigak. (Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Afghanistan 17), Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.Cortesi, E., Tosi, M., Lazzari, A., Vidale, M. (2008). Cultural relationships beyond the Iranian Plateau: the Helmand civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus valley in the 3rd millennium BCE. Paleorient, 34/2, 5-36.Curzon, N.G. (1892). Persia and the Persian question. London: Longmans Green & Co.Dupree, L. (1963). Deh Morasi Ghundai: a Chalcolithic site in south-central Afghanistan. New York: Anthropological Papers of American Museum of Natural History 50.Durante, S. (1979). The utilization of Xancus pyrum (L.) at Shahr-i Sokhta: a further evidence of cultural relations between India and Iran in the 4th and 3rd millennium BC. In: J. E. Van Lohuizen-de Leeuv (ed), South Asia Archaeology, 1975: 27-42, Leiden: Brill.Fairservis, W. (1961). Archaeological studies in the Seistan basin of south-western Afghanistan and eastern Iran. New York: Anthropological Papers of American Museum of Natural History 48.Francfort, H.P. (1989). Fouilles de Shortugai: recherches sur l’Asie central protohistorique. Paris: De Boccard.Franke, U. (2008). Baluchistan and the Borderlands. In: D. Pearsall (ed.), Encyclopedia Archaeology: 651-670, New York.Franke, U. (2015). Southeastern Baluchistan until the early 3rd Millennium BCE. In: U. Franke and E. Cortesi (ed), Lost and found: prehistoric pottery treasures from Baluchistan: 149-155, Berlin: German Archaeological Institute.Görsdorf, J., & Frank-Vogt, U. (2007). Implication of radiocarbon dates from Sohr Damb/Nal. Radiocarbon, 49(2): 703-712.Hakemi, A. (1997). Shahdad: archaeological excavations of a Bronze Age center in Iran. Rome: IsIAO.Hargreave, H. (1929). Excavations in Baluchistan, 1925: Sampur Mound, Mastung and Sohr Damb. New Delhi: Memoires of Archaeological Service of India 35.Jarrige, C., Jarrige, J.F., Meadow, R., Quivron, G. (1995). Mehrgarh: field reports 1974-1985, from Neolithic to the Indus civilization. Karachi: The Department of Culture and Tourism, Government of Sindh.Jarrige, J.F., Didier, A., Quivron, G. (2011). Shahr-i Sokhta and the chronology of the Indo-Iranian Regions. Paleorient, 37(2): 7-34,.Knox, R. (1994). A New Indus Valley Cylinder Seal. In: A. Parpola and P. Koskikallio (ed), South Asian Archaeology 1993: 375-378, Helsinki: Suomalainen.Lal, B.B., Joshi, P.J., Thapar, K.B., Bala, M. (2003). Excavations at Kalibangan: the early Harappans (1960-1969). New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. (1970). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1969. Progress Report 1. Cambridge, MA: American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin, 27, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. (1986). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1976. New York: Harvard University Press.Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C.. & Tosi, M. (1973). Shahr-i Sokhta and Tepe Yahya: tracks on the earliest history of the Iranian Plateau. East and West, 23(1-2): 21-57.MacKay, E. (1938). Further Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro. 2 vols. Delhi.Majidzadeh, Y. (2008). Excavations at Konar Sandal in the region of Jiroft in the Halil Basin: first preliminary report (2002-2008). Iran, 46: 69-103.Mann, J. (2013). Harappan pottery traditions in Haryana. New Delhi: Research India Press.Marshal, J. (1931). Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus civilization. London: Arthur Probsthain.Masson, V. (1988). Altyn-Depe. Philadelphia: The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.Mortazavi, M. (2010). Comparative Study of Societies of Southeast Iran and the Valley of Indus, Journal of Subcontinent Researches, 2(2): 111-139.Mutin, B. (2013). Ceramic traditions and interactions on the south-eastern Iranian Plateau during the fourth millennium. In: C. E. Petrie (ed.), Ancient Iran and its neighbours: 253-275, Oxford: Oxbow Books.Piperno, M., Salvatori, S. (1983). Recent results and new perspectives from the research at the graveyard of Shahr-i Sokhtan, Sistan, Iran. Annali dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale, 43(2): 173-191.Potts, D., Lamberg-Karlovsky C.C., Pittman, H., Kohl, Ph. (2004). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1976, the third millennium. New York: American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletins, Peabody Museum Press.Potts, T.F. (1993). Pattern of trade in third millennium BC Mesopotamia and Iran. World Archaeology, 24(3): 379-402.Sajjadi, S.M., Forouzanfar, F., Shirazi, R., Baghestani, S. (2003). Excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta, first preliminary report on the excavations of the graveyard, 1997–2000. Iran, 41: 21–97.Salvatori, S., Tosi, M. (2005). Shahr-i Sokhta revised sequence. In: C. Jarrige and V. Lefèvre (eds.), Souh Asiain Archaeology 2001: 281-292, Paris, Editions Recherches sur les Civilization.Sarianidi, V. (2002). Marguş: ancient oriental kingdom in the old delta of the Murghab River. Aşgabat: Türkmendöwlethabarlary.Sarianidi, V. (2007). Necropolis of Gonur, Athen: Kapon Editions.Shaffer, J. (1971). Preliminary field report on excavations at Said-Kala-Tepe. Afghanistan, 24(2/3): 89-127.Shirazi, R. (2018). Archaeological excavations at Tepe Sadegh (seasons 6 and 7: 2016 and 2017), in: R. Shirazi (ed.), Reports of the 16th Annual Symposium on the Iranian Archaeology (Collection of Short Articles 2017), Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute Publications, pp. 298-306.Shirazi, R., Dehmardeh, M. (2014). Cultural Relations between Baluchistan, Iran and Pakistan in the Third Millennium BCE Based on New Archaeological Investigations in Makran, Iran, Journal of Subcontinent Researches, 6(20): 43-64.Steinkeller, P. (2013). Trade routes and commercial networks in the Persian Gulf during the third millennium BC. In: Scientific Board of the third international conference of the Persian Gulf (ed.), Collection of papers presented in the third international biennial conference of the Persian Gulf: 413-431, Tehran, University of Tehran.Stien, A. M. (1931). An archaeological tour in Gedrosia. Culcatta: Cosmo publications.Stien, A. M. (1937). Archaeological reconnaissances in the north-western Indian and south-eastern Iran, Londons: MacMillan.Tosi, M. (1968). Excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta, a Chalcolithic Settlement in the Iranian Sistan. Preliminary Report on the First Campaign. East and West, 18(1-2): 9–66.Tosi, M. (1969). Excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta. Preliminary Report on the Second Campaign, September-December 1968. East and West, 19(3–4): 283–386.Tosi, M. (1983). Development, continuity and cultural change in the stratigraphical sequence of Shahr-i Sokhota. In: M. Tosi (ed.), Prehistoric Sistan 1: 127-180, Rome: IsMEO.Uesugi, A. (2017). Ceramics and terracotta figurines from Balochistan of the Katolec Collection. Tokyo: Katolec Corporation.Vatts, S. M. (1940). Excavations at Harappa, New Delhi: Bhartiya Publishing House.
تبلیغات
