آرشیو

آرشیو شماره ها:
۵۴

چکیده

سیّدضیاءالدّین طباطبائی، یکی از عوامل کودتای اسفند 1299، از سیاستمداران تأثیرگذار تاریخ معاصر ایران است. زندگی سیاسی اش با فعالیت های مطبوعاتی پیوندی تنگاتنگ دارد. از شانزده سالگی، با روزنامه ندای اسلام روزنامه نگاری را آغاز کرد؛ سپس شرق، برق و رعد را (تا کودتای 1299) منتشر کرد. او با زبانی تند و بی پروا به اشاعه اندیشه های انتقادی می پرداخت. دراین مقاله، لایه ی ایدئولوژیک واژگان نویسنده را به روش توصیفی تحلیلی با استناد به منابع روزنامه ای بررسی کرده ایم و با تفکیک سبک نویسنده ایدِئولوژی حاکم بر ذهن و زبان او را تحلیل کرده ایم. با توجّه به رویّه سیاسی او به این نتیجه دست یافتیم که چون مخاطبان اواولیای امور و سیاست گذاران بودند، جهان اندیشگانی او نگرش سیاسی یک طبقه اجتماعی را به عنوان یک کل، هدایت می کند و قلم اعتراضی او در جریانات مشروطه خواهی گزارش مناسبات جامعه و تغییر و تحولات اجتماعی و سیاسی است و زبان او جدی، انتقادی، صریح، تلخ و گزنده بوده است.

Stylistic analysis of the ideological layer of vocabulary in the writings Seyedziauddin Tabatabai

Seyedziauddin Tabatabai Yazdi, one of the agents of the March 1299 coup, is one of the most influential politicians in Iran's contemporary history, although his political life is closely linked with press activities, but his political face casts a shadow over his pen face.At the age of sixteen, he started working as a journalist with the newspaper Nedaya Islam (1288); Then he published Sharq (1327) and Barq (1328) and Raad (until the coup of 1299).By foreclosing one newspaper, he started another newspaper and spread critical thoughts with harsh and reckless language.In this article, while introducing the newspapers and written works of Seyyedziaddin Tabatabai, using the "layered stylistics" method, his lexical style was examined in a descriptive and analytical method by referring to the aforementioned newspaper sources. We have done and have tried to analyze the ideology ruling his mind and language by separating the style of this period from the individual style of the writer and considering the requirements of the time.Paying attention to the political attitude of Seyedzia's newspapers, we came to the conclusion that because his audience was mostly leaders of affairs and policymakers, his intellectual world guides the political attitude of a social class as a whole.And in this target group, his protest in the currents of constitutionalism is reporting on the relations of society and social and political changes and developments, and his language has been more serious than populist newspapers with a critical, frank, serious, bitter and sharp language

تبلیغات