بررسی تأثیر نقش کنشگران تولید مکان در شکلگیری مفهوم حس دلبستگی مکانی (مورد پژوهی: اسلام شهر) (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
سیاست های متفاوت توسعه شهری منجر به نقش کنشگران مختلف در شکل دهی به مکان می شود و این امر نتایج متفاوتی در تولید مکان در پی خواهد داشت. درک این تفاوت و تاثیر آن بر محصول نهایی (شکل گیری مکان و از آن رهگذر حس دلبستگی مکانی میان ساکنین) هدف این پژوهش است. بر این اساس در این مقاله با بهره گیری از روش ترکیبی کیفی- کمی به بررسی میزان حس دلبستگی مکان (به عنوان شاخص اصلی در شکل گیری مکان) در محلات شهر اسلامشهر با خاستگاه های مختلف شکلگیری حاصل از نقش متفاوت کنشگران، پرداخته شده است. روش گردآوری داده ها در بخش بررسی میزان دلبستگی مکانی، پیمایش با استفاده از پرسشنامه و در بخش بررسی میزان نقش کنشگران، تحلیل اسناد و مصاحبه عمیق با مطلعین بوده است (رویکرد کیفی پژوهش). روش تحلیل داده ها بر مبنای بررسی معناداری اختلاف میانگین شاخص حس دلبستگی مکانی بین محلات دسته بندی شده در سه گونه مشارکت کنشگران است (رویکرد کمی پژوهش). این سه دسته عبارتند از: "ساخت به وسیله کنشگران با خاستگاه غیررسمی (مردم)"، "ساخت به وسیله کنشگران با خاستگاه رسمی (دولت)" و "ساخت به وسیله کنشگران با خاستگاه ترکیبی از کنشگران". نتایج نشان می دهد در محیط های شکل گرفته تحت تأثیر ترکیبی از کنشگران، حس دلبستگی مکانی بالاتر از محیط های شکل گرفته تحت تأثیر تنها کنشگران رسمی (دولت) یا غیررسمی (جامعه محلی) است. به عبارت دیگر می توان چنین نتیجه گرفت، کنش متقابل میان کنشگران و تأمین شدن منافع کلیه گروه های ذی مدخل می تواند منجر به تبدیل فضا به مکانی دارای معنا برای ساکنین و از این رهگذر ارتقای حس دلبستگی مکانی آنان شود.Investigating the Effect of the Role of Actors in Placemaking and Shaping Place Attachment (Case Study: Islamshahr)
Introductoin Rapid population growth and the subsequent urbanization process require the expansion of cities. In this regard, the spatial expansion patterns of cities have been formed in different ways. Some of these developments are based on the official policy and planning system and some are unplanned because of the growth of rural cores. Some of them result from suburban growth or the rapid growth of small towns around big cities. The supreme goal in these development patterns is the formation of a mutual relationship between man and man-made space, the formation of meaning in space, and turning it into a place. In recent years, many studies have been conducted on places and the way to interact with them. These researches seek to understand and explain the mutual relationship between people and places. Place attachment, as a multi-dimensional and interdisciplinary concept that seeks to examine the emotional bond between a person and a place, is one of the important axes of these studies. Different patterns of place formation have been the result of different actors and their diverse forms of action. These actors can be identified and investigated in different layers of power in the city, and this will lead to different results in the production of place. The main problem of this research is to investigate the way the actions of the actors in the place's formation affect the sense of place attachment. Based on this, the main question of this research is: "How does the interaction of actors in the production of a settlement affect the level of sense of place attachment and the formation of place?" Materials and Methods In this article, using the qualitative-quantitative method, the level of place attachment (as the main indicator in the formation of the place) in the neighborhoods of Eslamshahr city, whose formation was the result of the role-playing of various actors, has been investigated. The level of actors' role in the production of space was determined by examining written documents; including books and documents related to Eslamshahr, such as comprehensive and detailed plans, and interviewing city managers, experts, and informants to explore oral memory; for knowing the hidden dimensions of the formation of the investigated neighborhoods, and converting this information into a map. Therefore, the approach of this part of the research is qualitative. In this process, an interview was arranged according to the goals and needs, using the snowball technique. Based on this, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 people. This number of interviews was conducted based on theoretical persuasion. After examining the role of actors and their level of participation in the production of neighborhoods, three types of neighborhoods were identified. Neighborhoods with the origin of official action - planning system, neighborhoods with the origin of non-official action - people-based, and neighborhoods with the origin of a combination of activists (dominance with a specific actor is not seen). Based on the role of the activists, the neighborhoods of the city were categorized, and finally, six neighborhoods of Allahu Akbar, Zia Abad (representing neighborhoods with non-official-people origins), Bagh Faiz, Qasim Abad (representing neighborhoods with mixed origins), Vavan and Qamiyeh (as representative of the localities with the official origin-planning system) were selected to check the hypotheses of the research. Since this research examines the existence of a meaningful relationship between the variable of place attachment and the role and level of participation of actors in the production of target neighborhoods (the quantitative part of the research), the research is an applied type based on the Kruskal Wallis Test. The analysis was done by SPSS software. A questionnaire was used to collect the required information about the residents' sense of place attachment. The statistical population of this research is all the residents of the selected neighborhoods of Eslamshahr city. The sample size for each category of neighborhoods was calculated using Cochran's formula and distributed based on the population ratio of each neighborhood in the respective category.The questionnaire was prepared in the form of a five-point Likert scale and was given to 12 experts to check its content validity. Their correction suggestions were applied to the questionnaire and then the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. The CVI index was higher than 0.79 for all questions, which indicates acceptable content validity of the questionnaire. To check the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated, which was more than 0.7 for all the criteria, and indicated an acceptable level of reliability of the questionnaire. Then, through the Kruskal-Wallis test, the significance level of the difference in the mean dimensions of place attachment was estimated in the three categories of neighborhoods mentioned above. Findings After examining and quantifying the role of actors in the formation of each neighborhood, the place attachment indicators were examined under four categories of individual, perceptual, cognitive, social, and physical criteria. The general situation of the measures of sense of place attachment in neighborhoods with the origin of a combination of activists is noticeably higher than the neighborhoods with purely official or non-official origins. The individual measure of sense of place attachment, which includes two indicators of the duration of residence and type of ownership, has a proper and similar situation in two types of neighborhoods with mixed origins and neighborhoods with non-official origins. While in other neighborhoods, the individual indicator shows less than the average of 3. This can indicate the higher willingness of the residents to continue living in such neighborhoods.The perceptual, and cognitive criterion of neighborhoods with mixed origin has a proper status, with an average of 3.45. While the non-official origin neighborhoods (2.75) and official origin neighborhoods (2.40) have a poor situation. This is about the Lack of elements of identity and a sense of belonging due to non-participation in the construction process in neighborhoods with official origin. Some social indicators in this research include neighborhood bonds, network, and social bonds, civic participation, and formative trust in a concept called social capital. This index is usually high due to the existence of close social ties between residents of neighborhoods with non-official origins. However, the organizational trust index (trust in the municipality, government organizations, and schools) does not have a proper situation in this type of settlement. On the other hand, this index has a proper situation in settlements with mixed origins. This index does not have a good status in neighborhoods with the official origin and the level of all sub-indices, including neighborhood ties, civic participation, network, and social ties, as well as trust (public and organizational) is low in these types of neighborhoods. Physical criteria in mixed-origin neighborhoods have a good status (3.55). Also, in the localities with official origins, due to the formation based on the previous plan, the amount of service per capita is approximately standard and provides a relative level of satisfaction. Of course, the physical and functional diversity in neighborhoods with mixed origins causes higher satisfaction in these neighborhoods than in standard neighborhoods of official origin. Due to the pressure of providing housing in non-official settlements and the lack of appropriateness of services to the population, the physical condition of this settlement is poor. Considering the results of the Kruskal-Wallis test (and the significance level of the test (Sig=0.000), the hypothesis of the harmony of the sense of place attachment index in the sample community is rejected, and as a result, the significance of the difference in the sense of place attachment index in different categories of neighborhoods is proven in terms of the origin of formation. Conclusion The results of this research show that there is a significant relationship between place actors and the sense of place attachment. This index is the highest in neighborhoods with mixed origins and the lowest in neighborhoods with official origins. What can be considered a practical result of this research is the effect of the processes followed in the construction of space (procedural dimension) on the final product (content dimension) i.e. the construction of place. The formation of the physical and functional shell alone cannot lead to the transformation of space into place. Moreover, the relative level of services in pre-planned neighborhoods, these neighborhoods have less sense of place attachment than other neighborhoods. Perhaps for this reason, it has become difficult and far-fetched to transform newly built urban spaces such as new cities into lively places where its residents feel a sense of belonging. Therefore, the most important solution to overcome this problem can be to change the existing procedures of planning, designing, and building the space and replace them with collaborative, multifaceted procedures with the presence of different actors. The urban planning system should be able to provide the necessary platform for the participation of various official and non-official actors as well as the free market. Regardless of the objective result of this participation, this process itself will shape the sense of place attachment and cause the space to become a place.
تبلیغات
